Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1914No. 2897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of assault to murder, his punishment being assessed at three years confinement in the penitentiary.

There is what purports to be a statement of facts accompanying the transcript; it is certified by the official stenographer of the District Court to be correct. It seems in its entirety to be made up by questions and. answers; and further, it may be noted that the statement of facts is not approved either by counsel or by the trial court. Being in this condition, this court can not consider it as a statement of facts.

Appellant moved the court to submit the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Potter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Muldrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Conatser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API