Conatser v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PREHDERGAST, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was convicted for pursuing the business or occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory and his punishment assessed at the lowest prescribed by law.
The evidence is amply sufficient to show, and the jury were clearly justified in finding him guilty in that it establishes that during the time alleged, he pursued the business, made many sales of intoxicating liquor to various persons alleged, as well as others, and that prohibition was in force in said county at the time.
He made a motion for a continuance on account of the absence of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Potter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Backus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.