Legal Opinion

Mahmoodjanloo v. Mahmoodjanloo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 2007No. 101,196PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, V.C.J.

1 This is an appeal by Behrooz Mahmo-odjanloo, father and custodial parent of two daughters, from the trial court's order denying his post-decree effort to relocate with his children to New York. Father argues the trial court misapplied the statutory burden of proof set forth in 43 0.8. Supp.2004, § 112.3,1 the new relocation act, and we agree. He complains of the new statute's failure to follow existing law and also challenges the statute's constitutionality. We reverse the order of the trial court for its misapplication of the statutory burden of proof, and remand the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Evers v. FSF Overlake AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Schwartz v. DiehlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Thielenhaus v. ThielenhausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. BOATMAN v. BOATMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. SCOCOS v. SCOCOSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Hart v. BertschCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Marriage of Plumlee v. PlumleeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API