Legal Opinion

SCOCOS v. SCOCOS

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 2016No. 112,728PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

[1 The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in finding Appellant/Mother's request to relocate from Oklahoma with the parties' child was not made in good faith. The trial court opined that the sole reason for the relocation to Louisiana was due to a love interest and found the request was made in bad faith. We previously retained the case and find error warranting reversal of the trial court’s ruling.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Kayla J. Giles, 1 Mother/Appellant, and Andrew M. Scocos, Father/Appellee, were married on July 4, 2011, in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The couple had one child together, Á.E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Curry v. StreaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. In Re the Reinstatement of OtisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Mahmoodjanloo v. MahmoodjanlooSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BOATMAN v. BOATMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS OF SCHULTZSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. ARULKUMAR v. ARULKUMARSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
  4. BOATMAN v. BOATMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS OF SCHULTZSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API