Legal Opinion

State of Md. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 16, 1985No. Civ. HM84-3839PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HERBERT F. MURRAY, District Judge.

In the instant action the State of Maryland has sued several defendants for alleged violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and similar state antitrust statutes, Md.Comm.Law Code Ann. § 11-204(a)(1) (1983). The complaint names five defendants but because of mergers between four of the defendants, only three entities are presently before the court. They are: 1) Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (“BCBSA”), a national trade association which owns and licenses the rights to the Blue Cross and Blue Shield trade names; 2) Blue Cross…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Duane v. Government Employees InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992
  3. Gordon v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  4. Wexco Inc. v. IMC, INC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. INSURANCE BD. UNDER SOCIAL INS. PLAN v. MuirDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API