Legal Opinion
People v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 2012No. D058988PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*529Opinion
BENKE, Acting P.J .
Defendant and appellant Jovan Christian Jackson was charged with the sale of marijuana and possession of marijuana for sale. Prior to his trial the People filed a motion under Evidence Code section 402 for an order preventing him from offering evidence he was entitled to the defense provided by the Medical Marijuana Program Act (MMPA), Health and Safety Code1 section 11362.7 et seq., to patients who associate for the purpose of collectively cultivating medical marijuana.
At the hearing on the People’s motion, Jackson testified he and approximately five other…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. VillanuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. HochanadelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- United States v. Anthony PisarskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- City of Monterey v. CarrnshimbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- P. v. Fernandez CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.