Legal Opinion

People v. Sheridan

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1934No. Docket No. 2407PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

D efendant was charged in an amended information, containing five counts, with five separate offenses of forgery (fictitious name) and with two prior convictions, one in California and the other in New York. He admitted the prior conviction in California, but denied the one in New York, and pleaded not guilty to the forgery charges. On motion of the district attorney count III was dismissed. The jury found defendant guilty on counts I, II, IV and V, and of the- prior conviction in New York. From the judgments of conviction entered and the orders denying his motions for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. ThalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. BRACCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. BrancatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. In Re HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API