People v. Thal
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Louis II. Ward, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The defendant herein was convicted of the crime of violating the provisions of section 476 of the Penal Code, by making, passing, uttering, and publishing a fictitious check, with intent to defraud one Michel Marclescu. The information upon the second count of which he was tried and convicted was an amended information in two counts which had been presented by the district attorney and filed by leave of court on the day upon which the defendant’s case was called for trial and prior to the impaneling of the jury in the cause. The charge in the original information against the defendant was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. KaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. SalhusIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. CryderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.