Legal Opinion

WW Rodgers and Sons Produce Co. v. Johnson

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 17, 1984No. 05-84-00174-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITHAM, Justice.

Relators, W.W. Rodgers and Sons Produce Company and W.W. Rodgers and Sons Trucks, Inc., seek mandamus against respondent, the Honorable H. Dee Johnson, judge of the 44th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, ordering Judge Johnson to permit certain discovery. We grant leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the petition, we conclude that the trial court correctly refused to permit the discovery. Accordingly, we deny the writ of mandamus.

Before June 19, 1983, the Supreme Court had unrestricted power to issue writs of mandamus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Barker v. DunhamTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Russell v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Qwest Microwave, Inc. v. Bedard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Hennessy v. Marshall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Pickell v. Guaranty National Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Merritt v. Harless, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  5. National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. T.T. Barge Cleaning Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API