Legal Opinion

Ritchie v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1914No. 18,759PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The controversy in this action grew out of two contracts between the parties, one fox* the paving of streets and alleys, and an earlier one for the construction of a sewer. John Ritchie, the appellant, brought the action to recover $12,-343.75 for the paving of streets and alleys in the city of Topeka under a contract with the city made in April, 1909, in which it was stipulated that the work was to be completed on or before January 1, 1910, and that for every day that the work remained uncompleted after that time Ritchie should forfeit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Village of Fort Edward v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Linton Coal & Mining Co. v. PersonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hutton Contracting Co. v. City of CoffeyvilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. City of Topeka v. RitchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Seaside, City of v. RandlesOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Sioux Falls Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dolman v. Kaw Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API