Legal Opinion

Dolman v. Kaw Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 21,444PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*636The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The action was originally.begun by plaintiffs against the Kansas City, Kaw Valley and Western Railway Company to recover for work and material in the construction of an interurban line extending from Kansas City to Lawrence. The Kaw Valley Construction Company, which was the general contractor and had sublet a portion of the work to the plaintiffs, was not originally a party to the action, but subsequently was made a party, and the court sustained a motion to dismiss the action as to the railway company.

The case was tried by the court, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Ritchie v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Williams v. Casparis Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Neal v. GideonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Dettmer v. FullsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Bonicamp, Koelling & Smith v. McNeelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API