Legal Opinion

Sioux Falls Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1942No. File No. 8494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

An action was brought by the plaintiff to enjoin the city of Sioux Falls from paying W. T. Davis Construction Company a balance which it claimed to be due and owing it from the city of Sioux Falls upon a contract for doing certain work on the water tanks and standpipes, a part of the city water system. Sioux K. Grigsby made application to intervene and the court upon a showing permitted the intervention. It developed later that said Grigsby sought to recover for the city of Sioux Falls, certain payments made to the said Davis, charging that the payments were illegal and that the said payments…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Seaboard Rice Milling Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Boyette v. Preston Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Labrado v. County of El Paso, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  2. Burhenn v. Dennis Supply Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bozied v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Foss v. SpitznagelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hoiten v. City of CanistotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API