State v. Young
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court.— Hon. James A. How®, Judge. TheI defendant was the duly elected and qualified binder of tbe State of Iowa for two years beginning January 2, 1899, and the plaintiff claims that during that period be was overpaid by tbe State for work done in that capacity. Tbe petition in tbe first count alleges that be was paid for binding a large number of pamphlets and documents with covers, when these were in fact bound without covers.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Polk District Court.— Hon. James A. How®, Judge. TheI defendant was the duly elected and qualified binder of tbe State of Iowa for two years beginning January 2, 1899, and the plaintiff claims that during that period be was overpaid by tbe State for work done in that capacity. Tbe petition in tbe first count alleges that be was paid for binding a large number of pamphlets and documents with covers, when these were in fact bound without covers. Tbe items, with tbe amounts paid, together with tbe fees allowed by statute for binding without covers, are as follows: Stat-Amount utory…
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The defendant was the duly elected and qualified State Binder of the State of Iowa for the term of two years beginning January 2, 1899, and the plaintiff claims that during such period he was overpaid for work done in that capacity. Section 141 of the Code fixes the prices which shall be paid:—
For all work done for the State in an acceptable manner, as in this chapter provided: (1) For folding and trimming all documents not stitched, ten cents' per hundred copies; (2) for folding, trimming, and stitching documents not covered, fifteen cents per one hundred copies; (3) for *509folding, stitching,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Litchfield v. The Register and ReceiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Commissioners' Court v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lamar Township v. City of LamarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Employment Security Board v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- State v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.