Legal Opinion

McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1990No. 89-AB-1298; CA A62926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB), which held that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she had received accrued retirement benefits on the termination of her employment. We affirm.

Claimant worked for Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association (employer) from September 24, 1984, until she was discharged on June 5, 1989.1 During her employment, both she and employer contributed monthly to a retirement plan maintained by employer. At the time of claimant’s termination, the plan held $8,334. On separation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Employment Division v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API