Boytano v. Fritz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*468LANDAU, J.
Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of our decision that her challenge to the legal sufficiency of a proposed initiative measure that would amend the charter of the City of Klamath Falls presents a nonjusticiable controversy. 128 Or App 109, 875 P2d 476 (1994). We allow the motion and withdraw our opinion.
Plaintiff brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, requesting that the city’s election officer be prevented from placing the following initiative measure on the ballot:
“(a) The City of Klamath Falls, including its Council and elected or appointed officers, shall…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeParrie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Boytano v. FritzOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. TunkleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1998
- State v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- GTE Northwest Inc. v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.