Legal Opinion

People v. Meyer

New York County Courts

Decided January 19, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Noonan, J.:

The appellant has been convicted in the City Court of Buffalo, of being a disorderly person under section 899, subdivision 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows:

“The following are disorderly persons:
“1. Persons who actually abandon their wives or children, without adequate support, or leave them in danger of becoming a burden upon the public, or who neglect to provide for them according to their means.”

The only witness sworn at the trial was the complainant, Etta Meyer, and her testimony and the judgment roll in a separation action, instituted by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. . BarkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. People Ex Rel. Commissioners of Public Charities & Correction v. CullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. People ex rel. Demos v. DemosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. People ex rel. Feeney v. DershemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Kingsbury v. SternbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GrossRochester City Court · 1936
  2. People v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City of New York v. McCarthyNew York Court of Special Session · 1931
  4. People v. Schenkel, New York County Courts1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API