Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. Marland
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 3, 1997No. AC 15908PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The named defendant, Charles A. Mar-land, appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered after a trial to the court. On appeal, the defendant1 claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to dismiss, (2) nonsuited the defendant on his counterclaims, (3) found that the plaintiffs successor in interest possessed title to provide standing to enforce the note, and (4) admitted evidence of proof of the debt. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On January 6, 1993, Connecticut National Bank (CNB) commenced a foreclosure action against the defendant,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doyle v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- DiBella v. WidlitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Retirement Management Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Fleet National Bank v. NazarethConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. St. JohnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. HuckabeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Kaye v. HousmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.