Legal Opinion
Fleet National Bank v. Nazareth
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 2003No. AC 22610PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this foreclosure action, the defendants Vijay J. Nazareth and Charmaine G. Nazareth1 appeal from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the substitute plaintiff, R. I. Waterman Properties, Inc. (plaintiff).2 On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) found an identity of interest between Fleet National Bank (Fleet National) and the plaintiff, and (2) found that the plaintiff had standing to foreclose the mortgage at issue.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- M. Dematteo Construction Co. v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Blakeney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In Re Van EckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Mercer v. RodriquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Young v. VlahosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.