Legal Opinion
State v. Bettencourt
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided February 15, 2001No. 99-476-C.APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Court for oral argument on January 22, 2001, pursuant to an order that directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memo-randa filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be decided at this time.
The facts of this case are more elaborately presented in State v. Bettencourt, 723 A.2d 1101 (R.I.1999). The basic facts of this case insofar as relevant…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- State v. BettencourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- State v. FortesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- State v. TiernanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- United States v. Michael Malgoza and Tomas MonteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. SnellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- State v. QuaweaySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Blinn v. City of East ProvidenceSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.