Legal Opinion

State v. Tiernan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 12, 1994No. 92-461-C.APublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Acting Chief Justice.

This case comes before us on appeal by the defendant, David M. Tiernan, Jr. (defendant), from the trial justice’s denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 35 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure to reduce his sentence. We deny his appeal and affirm the order entered by the trial justice.

The precise issue we confront in this appeal is the question of whether the trial justice improperly considered either defendant’s exercise of his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution or his exercise…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. James Lee StockwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. KnightSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. Siple v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  4. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API