Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Malgoza and Tomas Monte

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 23, 1993No. 90-5940PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Norman Malgoza and Tomas Monte were convicted of distributing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 959(a)(1), and conspiring to import cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a). On appeal, Monte challenges his conviction and sentence. Malgoza challenges only his conviction. Finding no reversible error, we affirm both appellants’ convictions and sentences.

I. FACTS

This ease arises from a joint investigation conducted by Haitian and United States authorities. The appellants were involved with others in a scheme to import cocaine from Colombia to the United States by way of Haiti. While…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne DaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Gerald ConnellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Lester Leroy HummerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. John Anthony GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Nelson-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. ShenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. CampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API