United States v. Michael Malgoza and Tomas Monte
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Michael Norman Malgoza and Tomas Monte were convicted of distributing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 959(a)(1), and conspiring to import cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a). On appeal, Monte challenges his conviction and sentence. Malgoza challenges only his conviction. Finding no reversible error, we affirm both appellants’ convictions and sentences.
I. FACTS
This ease arises from a joint investigation conducted by Haitian and United States authorities. The appellants were involved with others in a scheme to import cocaine from Colombia to the United States by way of Haiti. While…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne DaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gerald ConnellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Lester Leroy HummerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John Anthony GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Nelson-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. ShenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. CampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.