Legal Opinion

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. 98-07413; CA A107200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) upholding the compensability of claimant’s neck surgery. Its principal contention on review is that the Board applied the wrong standard of proof by treating claimant’s case as a claim for a “combined condition” instead of a “consequential condition.” We affirm.

The following facts are not in dispute. Claimant worked as a receiving clerk for employer. In 1992, she was hit by a forklift while working. Employer accepted claimant’s claim for shoulder, knee, and foot injuries. When other symptoms occurred, claimant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CromptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Luckhurst v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Arms v. SAIF Corp. (In re Arms)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API