Legal Opinion

Sundance v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1987No. B017363PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from the award of $536,000 in attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs in a class action. The defendants, other than the City of Los Angeles, attack the award. The plaintiffs cross-appeal from the same award. We reverse and remand.

In 1975, the plaintiffs—four public inebriates and one taxpayer—brought a class action suit against various governmental entities in the City (City) and County of Los Angeles (County) to challenge the prosecution of public inebriates under California’s public intoxication statute (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (f)). This litigation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Beach Colony II v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Wysinger v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO. CALIF.California Court of Appeal · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API