Legal Opinion
Coshow v. City of Escondido
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 2005No. D045382PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
Paul Coshow and several other residents of Escondido, California (collectively Coshow) sued the City of Escondido (City) and the California Department of Health Services (Department) for declaratory and injunctive relief, challenging City’s plan to fluoridate its drinking water with hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFSA) and claiming the use of HFSA violates their constitutional rights and exposes the general public to unnecessary health risks. The court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of City and Department after finding Coshow failed to state a cause of action for…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Guzman v. County of MontereyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Groundwater CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- West Farms Mall, LLC v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.