McGavitt v. Guttman Realty Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 Guttman Realty Company and Gutt-man Oil Company (collectively “Guttman”) appeal the trial court’s decree finding a prescriptive easement across Guttman’s property in favor of Eddie McGavitt and Cheryl McGavitt for use of an access road by heavy trucks delivering coal to waiting barges. Guttman asserts that the court erred because it found that the McGavitts’ prescriptive easement arose from the easements granted to prior owners of the McGavitts’ property. We agree with Gutt-man’s assertions and conclude accordingly that the trial court erred. Accordingly; we reverse…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kanter v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Shaffer v. Baylor's Lake Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Hash v. SofinowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- SZYMANOWSKI v. BraceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. MummaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Private Road in Speers Boro, IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Halsey, W. v. Swingle, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.