RED RIVER SPRAY SERVICE, INC. v. Nelson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Red River Spray Service, Inc. appeals from an order denying its motion for new trial. Red River claims the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s findings and the trial court erred by admitting irrelevant evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
On June 7, 1984 Ray Zajac hired appellant Red River Spray Service, Inc. to spray herbicides by airplane over his cornfield. Errol Ernst, Red River’s president, flew an airplane at an altitude of 200 to 300 feet over Zajac’s property. Ernst testified he sprayed a combination of Atrazine and crop oil, but other testimony indicated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Gand v. Jay Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Schalow v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Beniek v. Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Anderson v. STATE, DEPT. OF NAT. RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.