Legal Opinion
Gand v. Jay Bros., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 1985No. C9-84-1821, C6-84-2179PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
The trial court found for plaintiff-respondent Gand on his claims for breach of contract and for bad faith attorney’s fees and denied defendant-appellant Jay Brothers, Inc.’s counterclaims. Jay Brothers, Inc. appeals from the judgment and contests the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm in part, reverse in part and modify.
FACTS
Appellant Jay Brothers, Inc. contracted with respondent Jack Gand in December of 1982 for Gand to provide sanding and salting services with his dump truck. The parties dispute the rate of compensation and the number of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- International Financial Services, Inc. v. FranzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- RED RIVER SPRAY SERVICE, INC. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- S.B. Foot Tanning Co. v. PiotrowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Hutchinson Utilities Commission Of The City Of Hutchinson v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.