Legal Opinion

Schalow v. Mason

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1985No. C9-85-579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

FACTS

The facts in this matter are described in Schalow v. Mason, 357 N.W.2d 150 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), where this court remanded the matter for a redetermination of the normal high water mark on the Masons’ lake property. On remand, the trial court found the ordinary high water mark on the Masons’ property to be 1198.6 feet above sea level. The court also found the dwelling constructed by the Masons violated applicable zoning ordinances and ordered them to seek a variance or move the structure. In this appeal, the Masons claim the trial court’s findings were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Gordon v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Schalow v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RED RIVER SPRAY SERVICE, INC. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Becker v. F & H Restaurant Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Balogh v. BaloghCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Garvey v. GarveyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API