Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. King

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1898No. Nos. 10,980-(105)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Johnson, J., denying a motion for a new trial in an action of ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

1. On October 1,.1892, one Fish was the owner of the land here in question, and on that day mortgaged it to plaintiff, and the mortgage was recorded. Thereafter, on February 25, 1896, Fish conveyed the land to one Long, who assumed and agreed to pay the first mortgage, and executed to Fish a second mortgage, which was recorded. The second mortgage was foreclosed by a sale made on January 20, 1896, to one Flynn, the assignee of the mortgage. Thereafter the first mortgage was foreclosed by a sale made on February 19, 1896, to this plaintiff. On January 18, 1897 (two days before the time to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowry v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. New England Mutual Life Ins. v. CapehartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Glover v. First Universalist ParishMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Abraham v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leland v. HeibergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Western Bank of Las Cruces v. MaloolyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Bagley v. McCarthy Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Young v. Union Joint Stock Land BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API