Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Holloway

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe district court for Becker county, refusing a new trial after trial by Mills, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This action was commenced, under the statute, to' determine adverse claims to real estate, consisting of section 19, township 140, range 43. Both parties claim to have acquired title from a common source, — the Minnesota Land Company. Several judgments for the recovery of money.were rendered and docketed against the Minnesota Land Company, the owner of this land, in the-order and at the times here stated, viz.: The senior judgment in fajvor of one Hawley, December 20, 1883; the third judgment in order of seniority in favor of the defendant Holloway, January 11,1884;. the fifth in order in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sprague v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Lamb v. JeffreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Thomas v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Sohroeder v. LahrmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Germann v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API