Legal Opinion
Young v. Union Joint Stock Land Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 84, Calendar No. 37,454PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
For some time prior to March 29,1933, Harry A. Chaney and wife were the owners of a 60-acre farm in Livingston county and in 1925 had executed a mortgage on that land to the defendant. On March 20, 1932, foreclosure proceedings by advertisement were started. The sale was held June 28, 1932, and the sheriff’s deed to defendant was recorded July 14, 1932.
On March 29, 1933, plaintiff acquired title to the premises from Chaney and wife and on July 12, 1933, brought a bill in equity for an extension of the period of redemption and an order restraining issuance of a writ of restitution. The lower…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Piatt v. FlahertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Trenery v. American Mortgage Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Trombley v. KlersyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perkins v. Century Insurance v. British General InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Postal v. Home State Bank for SavingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Steiner v. Monroe State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Leuthold v. Des Moines Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Hanneman v. BowinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935