Legal Opinion
Madsen v. Turlock Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1943No. Civ. No. 6642PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiff has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend the pleading. There is no appeal from that order. It does not appear that a judgment was entered pursuant to that order. The record contains no reference to a judgment.
The purported appeal in this ease was prematurely and erroneously taken from the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend. The right of appeal is statutory. No right of appeal exists unless it is found either in the Constitution or in enacted statutes. (2 Cal. Jur. Ill, § 4.) It has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Doran v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Rickert v. ZoegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Quilinchini v. Comisión de Servicio PúblicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- Weiss v. GarofaloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Brown v. Mayor of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Brown v. Mayor and City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.