Legal Opinion

Rickert v. Zoeger

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1915No. L.A. No. 3436PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action is to recover a sum of money alleged to be due upon an agreement for the sale of a "saloon business" in the city of Los Angeles.

The notice of appeal states that the plaintiff appeals "from the decision of the superior court rendered in said action, whereby the said court sustains defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's fifth amended complaint without leave to amend." The record does not show that any judgment was entered and it does not contain any other notice of appeal.

An order sustaining or overruling a demurrer is not an appealable order. (Moraga v. Emeric, 4 Cal. 308; Moulton…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Ashley v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Moulton v. EllmakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Moraga v. EmericCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. In Re Estate of RawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Madsen v. Turlock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API