Legal Opinion

Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1957No. Civ. 5361PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action in which plaintiff in his first amended complaint for injunctive relief sought to enjoin the F. W. Woolworth Company from collecting city of Fresno and State of California sales taxes in excess of the amount authorized by the Sales and Use Tax Law of California and by a Fresno city ordinance. Plaintiff also sought to enjoin Robert C. Kirkwood, the controller, and the State Board of Equalization from authorizing or recommending the use of a particular sales tax reimbursement schedule. A general demurrer to the original complaint was filed by defendant F. W. Woolworth Company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holden v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Evans v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Schmidt v. TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Wilbur v. CullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Evola v. Wendt Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Garat v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Schisler v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Tellefsen v. Key System Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API