Legal Opinion

Hafer v. Lemon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1938No. 28015PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Reford Lemon commenced this action in the district court of Caddo county against W. M. Hafer and H. C. Hafer to recover damages for the alleged alienation of the affections of his wife. Ruby Lemon. Prom a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff, the defendants have appealed. The parties are here referred to in the order of their appearance at the trial.

W. M. Hafer and H. C. Hafer are the grandfather and father, respectively, of the said Ruby Lemon. Plaintiff charges that the defendants, acting separately and together, and at a time when plaintiff and his wife were living happily together and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Goode, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Jones v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Brison v. McKellopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. GulagerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  3. De Wolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API