Legal Opinion
Halstead v. Stone
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 15, 1899PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from Howell Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Appellant has not complied with rules 11, 12 and 18 of this court and has no standing in this court, and we ash that the appeal be dismissed or judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The court will not look to the transcript, but there must be a clear and concise statement of the evidence. Walser v. Wear, 128 Mo. 652.
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.
— This case is here on a complete transcript. Appellant has filed a printed document which is stated on the cover to be, “Appellant’s Abstract and Brief,” and which inside the cover is styled, “Appellant’s Abstract and Brief — Statement,” and which is as follows:
*650“APPELLANT’S ABSTRACT AND BRIEP.
Statement.
“This is an action of ejectment in which the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of a piece of land, in West Plains, Mo., described in the petition by metes and bounds, but designated on the plat as “Dr. Shuttee.” It is situated just west of and adjoining lot 4, in block 1, of Curry’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Brand v. CannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Garrett v. Kansas City Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harding v. BedollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Western Storage & Warehouse Co. v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Lawson v. MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Shaffer v. DetieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Clements v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.