Garrett v. Kansas City Coal Mining Co.

Respondent files a motion herein suggesting the insufficiency of the abstract of the record filed by appellants under rule 13 of this court, and insists that the appeal should be dismissed, or the judgment affirmed as of a total failure to comply with said rule. The case was argued and submitted on its merits, attorneys for respondent, on argument, renewing the objection on account of the alleged insufficiency of the abstract, but neither in motion nor on argument specifically pointing out material omissions from the evidence, nor did he undertake to supply the omissions by an additional or…