Legal Opinion

Harding v. Bedoll

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 28, 1907PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Error to Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. James L. Fort. Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtOra Ves, J.

With the view we have of this case a short statement will suffice. Action by plaintiff against defendants in ejectment. Defendants Bedolls answer by general denial. Defendant Allen by general denial and a plea of adverse possession for ten years. Replication, a plea of former adjudication of Allen’s alleged title of adverse possession, in a former action, the details of which would be useless here. Plaintiff had judgment in the lower court, the circuit court of Butler county, and within the year defendants, sued out their writ of error here. Defendants, now plaintiffs in error, have filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Brand v. CannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Halstead v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Vandeventer v. GossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Bank of Tipton v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Collier v. Catherine Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Pennowfsky v. CoerverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Coleman v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Garard v. Manufacturers' Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Brown v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API