Legal Opinion

Clements v. Turner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 14, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Louisiana Court of Common Pleas. — Hon. Reuben F. Roy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

There is a total failure in this ease to comply with rules 12 and 13 of this court. The case is here upon a complete transcript, and the appellant has wholly failed to file any abstract of the record whatever. He has filed a statement, but even that fails to state the nature of this suit or the substance of the pleadings, or when or where it was instituted or tried, or what, if any, judgment was rendered, or what proceedings were had in the case, or whether a motion for new trial was filed, or whether a bill of exceptions was filed, or whether the case is here by appeal or writ of error, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Storage & Warehouse Co. v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Lawson v. MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Brand v. CannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Halstead v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whiting v. Big River Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Vandeventer v. GossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. ParrishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Whitehead v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Grubbs v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API