Legal Opinion

Ballew v. Ballew

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 28, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickerson, J.

This is a will contest. Mrs. Patricia M. Ballew is the proponent and sole beneficiary of the script under attack, except three small bequests of $5 each to children of Mr. John 0. Ballew by a former marriage. These terms will be used in this opinion: will for the script under attack; testator for John 0. Ballew; proponent for Mrs. Patricia M. Ballew; and contestants for the children of John 0. Ballew by a former marriage.

The trial judge entered judgment upon a directed verdict in favor of the will.

Thrée errors are assigned. One question is determinative in this Court: Does the record contain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Poole v. First Nat. Bank of SmyrnaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  4. Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  5. Finks v. GillumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  2. Estate of Brock Ex Rel. Yadon v. RistCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Bradford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  4. Charles Moore v. Clyde GreenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. Douglas L. Dutton, Albert J. Harb And Amy v. Hollars, Knoxville, Tennessee, ForCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API