Legal Opinion

Booze v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 2000PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 The issue is whether a limited tort plaintiff, injured in an auto accident, is entitled to full tort recovery from her auto insurance carrier under the Pennsylvania Bad Faith Statute, the Pennsylvania Unfair Trace Practices and Consumer Protection Law or the Pennsylvania Unfair Insurance Practices Act, where the insurance carrier failed to provide in the policy cost comparisons for limited and full tort coverage. 75 Pa.C.S. § 1705. We find that the plaintiff is not entitled to full tort coverage.

¶ 2 Appellant Carolyn Booze, and members of her proposed class, purchased automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Salazar v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Donnelly v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Moser v. HeistandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Seldon v. Home Loan Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API