Legal Opinion

Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2012No. 12 MDA 2008PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Appellants, Daniel and Sheryl Berg (collectively, the “Bergs”), appeal from the entry of judgment after the trial court granted Appellee Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Inc.’s (“Nationwide”) motion for a directed verdict on the Bergs’ claims under Pennsylvania’s bad faith insurance statute, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8371. For the reasons set forth herein, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for a new trial.

On September 4, 1996, the Bergs’ 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee was involved in an accident and sustained extensive damage. On the date of the accident, the Bergs were…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Wenk, J. v. State Farm Fire and CasualtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Hall v. Episcopal Long Term CareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Rancosky v. Washington National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API