Legal Opinion

China Trade Center, LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 29, 1999No. Civ.A. 98CV0485SSPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”), Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 The following facts are undisputed: WMATA is an interstate agency that was established in 1996 through a congressionally approved interstate compact among the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. WMATA is charged with the operation of the metrorail and metrobus transportation system in the greater Washington D.C. metropolitan area. Plaintiff, China Trade Center, L.L.C. (“China Trade”) is a limited…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Haney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Aero Corp., S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Birnberg v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adair v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Avtel Services, Inc. v. Unites StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. United States v. Prevezon Holdings, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. United States v. LivecchiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  5. American Science and Engineering, Inc. v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API