Legal Opinion
Birnberg v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 14, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-1740PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
This cause having been heard on the merits on February 6, 1975, and this Court having considered the extensive record and the arguments of counsel, we make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The plaintiffs are homeowners and residents of Yuma Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. They bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief attacking the validity of the decision by the Board of Directors of defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (hereinafter “WMATA”) to route the A9(a) segment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- China Trade Center, LLC v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power Authority of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- Randolph Civic Ass'n v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1977