Guarnaccia v. Wiecenski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In this action for damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as passenger in the defendants’ motor vehicle, in consequence of their negligence, the plaintiff had a verdict. The defendants have appealed from the court’s denial of their motion to set it aside, and also from the judgment. The first question upon the former appeal is whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. The jury could reasonably have found these facts: The plaintiff, employed as a shoveler, on the morning of August 12, 1940, was riding, at the direction of his foreman, in the body…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ezzo v. GeremiahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. McKeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Kennell v. BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Hinch v. ElliottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Southern Pac. Co. v. SchoerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Pluhowsky v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Mucci v. LeMonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.