Meeuwsen v. Clough & Warren Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lenawee; Hart (Burton L.), J. Assumpsit by Peter Meeuwsen against the Clough & Warren Company and the Manophone Corporation for commissions on the sale of goods. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Manophone Corporation brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The plaintiff, in March, 1917, was a manufacturers’ agent engaged in placing contracts between the assemblers of talking machines and the manufacturers of cabinets. Defendant Clough & Warren Company, prior to' December 20, 1916, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of pianos and organs at Adrian, Michigan. The defendant Manophone Corporation is a corporation, organized on December 20, 1916, at which time it took over the plant and business of the defendant Clough & Warren Company and since that time has been engaged in the manufacture and sale of talking machines and talking machine…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Ripley v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Dodge v. TullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Sokup v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- William's Delight Corp. v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- DeGrave v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Wabash Railway Co. v. BloomgardenMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Bruno v. ZwirkoskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983