Legal Opinion

Wabash Railway Co. v. Bloomgarden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer (George S.), J. Assumpsit by the Wabash Railway Company against Abraham J. Bloomgarden for certain freight and icing charges. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover the freight and icing charges on two car loads of peaches shipped from Willard, Utah, to Detroit in September, 1914. The shipments were made by the Gibson Fruit Company, consigned to itself at Chicago, in two' cars, numbered P. F. E. 11223 and P. F. E. 468, over the Oregon Short Line i’ailroad. On the arrival of the cars in Chicago, they were reconsigned by the consignee to its own order at Detroit, with instructions to notify the defendant, “Allow inspection without bill of lading,” “Protect through rate,” “Charges follow,” the words “we pay” being stricken out. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Meeuwsen v. Clough & Warren Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hanley v. GowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McEachran v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. International Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. New York Central Railroad v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. E. Bernier & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
  4. Michigan Central Railroad v. Saginaw Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of New Orleans v. C. B. Fox Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API