Ripley v. Case
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assuinpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 78 Mich. 126.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This case has been here once before, and will be found reported in 78 Mich. 126.
The case, as made by the plaintiff on the last trial, does not differ materially from that shown in the record of the first trial, upon which our opinion was based. The case of the defendant did not at all contradict or alter the case made by the plaintiff, except to show his good faith in the transaction; that he did not warrant *262the bond; that he sent it to New York, believing it to be good; that he himself made no fraudulent representations to Mr. Ripley; and that Ripley had ample opportunity to read the bond,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Ripley v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Krause v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Joslyn v. Cadillac Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Stowe v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- First National Bank v. Badger Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Antrim Lumber Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.