Legal Opinion
Ray v. Borgfeldt
California Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1915No. S.F. No. 6008PublishedCited by 12 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This ease was originally decided on appeal by the district court of the third district and the following opinion, prepared by Mr. Justice Hart, was filed:
“This action, brought to recover on two promissory notes, was tried before a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff .has appealed from the judgment thereupon entered in favor of the defendants and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
“The notes in suit were made in favor of the Banca Svizzera Americana of Locarno (commonly called and known as the Swiss American Bank) by F. Cavagnaro Company, C. J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Grogan v. Valley Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Eppinger v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Turner v. . New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Wilcox v. BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. KelseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Turner v. City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Lucas v. Hesperia Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.