Legal Opinion
Turner v. . New Bern
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 9, 1924PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOKE, J., concurring; STACY and ADAMS, JJ., concurring in the concurring opinion of HOKE, J. The city of New Bern, by its board of aldermen, upon a petition signed by about 150 citizens, passed the following ordinance:
"Section 1. Whoever establishes, maintains, operates or conducts a lumber yard or wharf where lumber is piled, stacked, or stored within the territory bounded by Johnson, East Front and Pollock streets and the channel of Neuse River shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined the sum of $10, and each day such business is maintained or…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Suddreth v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- City of Winston-Salem v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.